| Pages: [1] |
1. Announcement:Regarding Recent Connection Issues - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I emailed telia and asked them about the Destination net unreachable issue as it's coming on two days and still not able to access Eve Online. Their response: Hello, This is not our router , but our customerGÇÖs router that is nor responding: ...
- by Fiddler Hays - at 2014.11.20 14:14:33
|
2. Launcher not working? - LOOK HERE - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Had to run the repair utility 4 times but it finally unborked the Eve client and I'm now in. Whoop!
- by Fiddler Hays - at 2013.09.18 13:18:00
|
3. CCP's inconsistent handling of hi-sec. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Since most of the miners/industrialist like to whine or want to make hi-sec a haven, this is an attempt to point out CCPGÇÖs inconsistent handling of hi-sec which I believe is causing all of the angst. First. Eve Online is a sandbox game, PvP ce...
- by Fiddler Hays - at 2012.06.01 23:07:00
|
4. CCP time to fix the orca exploit - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: Nope. CCP has not put any restrictions on ships in HS. They only made the Police chase ebil criminals because that has a cool bit of realism. Also realistic is being able to run away from the police. And yet avoiding CONCORD's conseq...
- by Fiddler Hays - at 2012.05.31 02:11:00
|
5. CCP time to fix the orca exploit - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
RubyPorto wrote: Fiddler Hays wrote: I think the boggle is i find your posts on this issue to be very narrow. Shallow? Trite? I feel something is not is as intend with regards to hi-sec. You seem to feel the opposite and point to some lack...
- by Fiddler Hays - at 2012.05.31 01:35:00
|
6. CCP time to fix the orca exploit - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Fiddler Hays wrote: If that was the case why to we have CONCORD at all or restrict based on security? There are no restrictions. CONCORD serves the purpose of making sure that aggression in highsec comes at a cost. They're not...
- by Fiddler Hays - at 2012.05.30 23:55:00
|
7. CCP time to fix the orca exploit - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: What CCP is telling you is that it's your job to ensure your own security, and they've given you the tools to do so. If that was the case why to we have CONCORD at all or restrict based on security? Maybe because some people are a lit...
- by Fiddler Hays - at 2012.05.30 23:04:00
|
8. CCP time to fix the orca exploit - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
RubyPorto wrote: Fiddler Hays wrote: Tippia wrote: Fiddler Hays wrote: And I understand CCP not wanting to restrict anyone, but it would seem to me that they will need to revisit that idea. Why? Because I don't believe CCPs concep...
- by Fiddler Hays - at 2012.05.30 22:45:00
|
9. Is the penalty for suicide-ganking too low? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CONCORDS response to Outlaws/Criminals that enter Hi-sec is very underwhelming. Currently you can be -10.0 and still go anyway in EVE. Which would not be an issue if there were not ways to getting ships after entering. I have no issues with ganke...
- by Fiddler Hays - at 2012.05.30 22:41:00
|
10. CCP time to fix the orca exploit - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Fiddler Hays wrote: And I understand CCP not wanting to restrict anyone, but it would seem to me that they will need to revisit that idea. Why? Because I don't believe CCPs concept of hi-sec is working. Eve Online is a har...
- by Fiddler Hays - at 2012.05.30 22:19:00
|
11. CCP time to fix the orca exploit - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: CCP Restricts nobody from going anywhere. Faction Navies restrict SHIPS flown by Criminals from entering their space. As soon as you get illegally shot by a Pod, CONCORD and the Faction Navies will start shooting pods. Anyway, anyone c...
- by Fiddler Hays - at 2012.05.30 21:57:00
|
12. CCP time to fix the orca exploit - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Fiddler Hays wrote: Why isn't CCP taking consequences in hi-sec to a logical conclusion? I always hear that CONCORD gives consequences not protection. And yet criminals can waltz into hi-sec in a pod with no consequences. That...
- by Fiddler Hays - at 2012.05.30 21:30:00
|
13. CCP time to fix the orca exploit - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
bongsmoke wrote: Implying Implications wrote: Dumping ships into space for people to board is not an exploit. Agreed I dont like griefers, nor the bs ways of raping people, but orca isnt the problem. Just make Concord pod kill any pira...
- by Fiddler Hays - at 2012.05.30 21:11:00
|
14. How to fix ganking - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Have CONCORD pod criminals upon entry into Hi-sec. Miners can still get ganked but not indefinitely by the same toon(s).
- by Fiddler Hays - at 2012.05.30 20:42:00
|
15. What is the point of High Sec? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The only issue I see wrong with Hi-sec is that CONCORD is too soft on flagged criminals. I read a lot of advocates of PvP talk about consequences, tank your ship, etc. And yet they have the advantage that CONCORD will not pod them. I chuckle when ...
- by Fiddler Hays - at 2012.05.30 19:46:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |